Skip to content
Dhuaan

Search ward, school, village, city

Search ward, school, village, city

Does it work?

Predicted smoke against observed PM2.5 excess at monitoring stations, on days the model did not see during calibration.

Method

  1. 1A season replay around the 11 Nov 2025 smoke episode (window shown above). Definitions were fixed before looking at the data.
  2. 2Observed smoke signal: PM2.5 minus a rolling 7-day 10th-percentile baseline at the same station.
  3. 3Calibration: least squares PM2.5 excess ≈ α × model smoke, fitted on the first part of the window; skill is scored on the held-out remainder only.
  4. 4An episode is an excess of at least 60 µg/m³ for 3 or more hours; a hit is a forecast crossing within ±6 h.
  5. 5A uses VIIRS/MODIS detections only, as official counts do. B adds hourly afternoon geostationary detections. The A-to-B difference is the measured cost of the afternoon gap.

Limitations

  • Smoke from farm fires is one part of PM2.5. Traffic, industry, dust and winter inversions are not modelled; the excess baseline only partly removes them.
  • If reanalysis weather was used instead of archived forecasts, skill here is better than a live forecast would achieve.
  • Fires hidden by cloud or too small for the satellites are invisible to the model.
  • Monitors are sparse in rural Punjab, where the smoke lands first, so village-level forecasts are not directly verified.
  • Some stations fail. They are shown here, not dropped.